NATO called the damage to the Nord Streams a sabotage

Are there any investment ideas left in Russia? The pressure dropped sharply in branch A of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and in both lines of Nord Stream 1. “Here we are not talking about the readiness [to accuse], here we are talking about the beginning of a big job,” Zakharova noted. According to Der Tagesspiegel sources, two main versions are being considered— that it could have been an operation by Ukrainian forces or a Russian operation carried out under a “false flag”. “Any deliberate attack on critical Allied infrastructure will be met with a unified and decisive response,”— NATO assured. The Swedish Coast Guard on the morning of September 29 reported that a fourth leak had been discovered on gas pipelines, with two of the four leaks occurring in the exclusive economic zone of this country. It says that the position of the block is shared by the invited members of the alliance
Damage of Nord Stream 1 gas pipelines and Nord Stream 2 are a deliberate sabotage, according to NATO. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that the accidents on gas pipelines occurred in an area controlled by US intelligence agencies. Read on RBC Pro Pro 6 exercises to prevent problems due to sedentary work Instructions Pro Stressed shoulders and neck: 5 exercises to relieve stress Instructions Pro Cross-pollination: how the environment forms leaders, and leaders form the environment Instructions Pro Promotions and crypto is a game into an eagle. Authors Tags

Источник Russia intends to convene a meeting of the UN Security Council in connection with the “provocations” in relation to the Nord Stream 1 gas pipelines; and Nord Stream 2. These leaks pose risks to shipping and cause significant damage to the environment. About the unprecedented destruction on two gas pipelines of the company «daughter» “Gazprom” Nord Stream AG said Tuesday morning, September 27th. We support ongoing investigations aimed at establishing the origin of the damage,— the message says. Seismologists in Denmark and Sweden recorded powerful explosions in areas where there were leaks from the Nord Stream gas pipeline. <…> And now this gas is escaping into the air, — said the press secretary of the President Dmitry Peskov. German security authorities launched an investigation. “The destruction that occurred on the same day simultaneously on three strings of the offshore gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system is unprecedented,” the company said in a statement. This is stated in a press release published on the website of the North Atlantic Alliance. “All currently available information indicates that this is the result of deliberate, reckless and irresponsible acts of sabotage. employer needs to know Instructions

The Kremlin called the assumptions about Russia's involvement in the accidents “predictably stupid.” Both lines of Nord Stream 2 filled with gas, all systems are ready for pumping, and this gas is very expensive. The press service of the North Atlantic Alliance has published a special statement on the situation with the gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system. According to her, Sweden and Denmark, in whose special economic zones the accidents occurred, are “stuffed with American weapons”; and the situation there is “totally controlled by American intelligence agencies.”
However, she did not directly blame the United States. At the same time, the Kremlin did not make any specific accusations, stating that a thorough investigation is needed.


Hungarian Foreign Minister urged to avoid conflict between Russia and NATO

In his opinion, a clash between Moscow and NATO would jeopardize the existence of the planet, and Hungary, in this regard, takes the position that alliance forces should not be sent to Ukraine. The North Atlantic Alliance denies its direct participation in the conflict, but NATO countries supply Ukraine with weapons. Hungarian Foreign Minister Szijjártó: it is necessary to avoid a direct conflict between Russia and NATO /v6_top_pics/resized/673xH/media/img/1/54/756640042253541.jpg 673w” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width : 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
Peter Szijjarto
In the current situation, it is important to prevent a conflict between Russia and the North Atlantic Alliance because of its consequences, said in an interview with RIA Novosti Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto. In addition, they emphasized that the bloc is not looking for a confrontation with Moscow, but will respond to its actions in the event of an attack on one of the NATO members. Read on RBC Pro Pro Existential horror: why Apple intimidates buyers , which will only strengthen his Articles Pro 90 days before the shutdown of foreign cybersecurity systems. Szijjártó said that since the end of February, the expectation that there would be no major wars in the world has become illusory. What to do Pro How To Valuing Real Estate During Turbulence: What Owners Need to Know Pro Articles 9 Ways to Quickly Recover from Stress Pro How To Do Why Email Has Made Employees Unhappy: 3 Reasons Pro Articles “Pay Growth For Years”: What It's Like To Work At Cisco – In 5 Points Articles Authors Tags Who is not subject to partial mobilization
Understanding the mailing list

Источник In July, the alliance adopted a new Strategic Concept, in which Russia is called the main threat block security. “Now this is the most important task— to avoid any direct conflict between Russia and NATO, since this will lead us to such consequences that neither side wants, — he said. The Minister stressed that the resolution of the conflict depends largely on the dialogue between Russia and the United States. The Russian side has repeatedly accused NATO of direct or indirect participation in the conflict in Ukraine. In accepting the document, NATO member countries also called on Moscow to stop the special operation in Ukraine. In early August, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the Ukrainian authorities “gave away their country, their territory, and, worst of all, their people for use.” The West and NATO, which unleashed a “fundamental confrontation” against Russia.


Peaceful plans for genocide. The story of how the US and NATO did not threaten Russia

Now they are trying to impose on us already new dividing lines and walls — albeit virtual, but still dividing, cutting our common continent. In 1999, two very important events took place. “NATO is not looking for a conflict with Russia”
“NATO is not looking for a conflict with Russia”, — announced Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. How Vladimir Putin wanted to join NATO
In 2000, Vladimir Putinin an interview with the BBC, he said he was considering Russia's membership in NATO: “Why not? In 1996, director Tim Burton released the dark humor film Mars Attacks! Representatives of Russia reasonably noted that plans to deploy anti-missile position areas near the borders of the Russian Federation could not be considered otherwise than as an attempt to reduce the possibility of a nuclear potential for a retaliatory strike. When Turkey was included in NATO in 1952, again declaring the peaceful nature of the organization, Joseph Stalinsarcastically remarked: “Shouldn't we join NATO then?”
On March 31, 1954, the government of the USSR sent an official note asking for admission to the North Atlantic Alliance. Moreover, to implement it, it was planned to use, among other things, units of the Wehrmacht that had just surrendered to the Western allies. Thus, the promises of NATO's non-expansion to the East were buried, and the alliance itself carried out a large-scale offensive operation, which had no analogues in Europe since 1945. Will it really take many years and decades again, a change of several generations of politicians, to “sort” and “dismantle” these new walls?»
Western politicians considered that speech aggressive. Therefore, the “Unthinkable” sent to the archive. Decades of the history of the North Atlantic Alliance clearly prove — NATO has no other ultimate goal, except for the destruction of Russia. This document, signed in 1972, was one of the cornerstones of nuclear security. In 1997, the founding act of Russia was signed — NATO, which declared that the parties do not consider each other as adversaries. First — inclusion in the alliance of three former members of the Soviet bloc (Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic). “Against whom is this expansion against?”
In 2007, speaking at a security conference in Munich, Vladimir Putin stated: “The process of NATO expansion has nothing to do with modernizing the alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. The peak of the Cold War historians often refer to the Cuban Missile Crisis, which began with the secret operation Anadyr as — the transfer of Soviet medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads to Cuba. The American side called these actions of the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev reckless. Thus, the ability of the Soviet side to take countermeasures in the event of a strike was reduced to a minimum. We came in peace!»
Perhaps this is the best illustration of the attitude of the West towards our country since the end of the Second World War. The headquarters of Dwight Eisenhower — by the way, a holder of the Soviet military order “Victory”. The range of these missiles was 2,400 kilometers, which allowed them to hit the European part of the USSR, including Moscow. “Tasks Regarding Russia”: what America wanted to turn the USSR into
In 1948, the memorandum “Tasks Regarding Russia” was issued in the United States. Rate the material
Источник In response, the Soviet side announced the deployment of its missiles on the territory of Czechoslovakia and the GDR. Dropshot Plan assumed the prevention of retaliatory strikes from the USSR, the complete destruction of its military infrastructure, the occupation of the defeated country with the division of four “zones of responsibility”: the Western part of the USSR, the Caucasus — Ukraine, Ural — Western Siberia — Turkestan, Eastern Siberia — Transbaikalia — Primorye. «Dropshot»: destruction of millions of Soviet people and occupation
On April 4, 1949, 12 countries, among which were the signatories of the Brussels Pact, the United States, Canada, as well as Denmark, Italy, Norway, Portugal and Iceland, concluded the North Atlantic Treaty. And all the talk about a peaceful nature is a fairy tale. In it, the inhabitants of the Red Planet, who arrived on Earth with predatory goals, are chasing earthlings with blasters and destroying them, while saying: “Don't run away! This corresponds to the concept of “disarming strike” adopted in the US nuclear doctrine; — that is, Washington will strike first with its own forces so that the enemy will not have the opportunity to retaliate. It was about tens of millions of people. And what happened to the assurances given by the Western partners after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? The American side argued that the refusal of the treaty was connected with the desire to ensure their own security on the part of Iran, North Korea and other so-called “rogue states”. Russian politicians have repeatedly posed the question to Western partners: if NATO's expansion to the East is not directed against Russia, then what kind of does it make sense? Russia, based on statements about the peaceful nature of NATO, again proposed to consider the question of our country's inclusion in the alliance. At the same time, the plan indicated that due to large-scale destruction, the life of the survivors would be “very complicated.”
“The unrealistic nature of the proposal does not deserve discussion”: how the USSR was not taken into NATO
The creation by the Soviet Union of its own atomic bomb in 1949 reduced the possibility of planning nuclear attacks against our country, but by no means made it completely abandoned. announced the US unilateral withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM). Particular attention was paid to Moscow and Leningrad. 179 targets were included in the list of targets subject to an atomic strike in Moscow, in Leningrad — 145 targets. 
American researchers who studied the plan stated that it provided for the targeted destruction of the civilian population of the Soviet Union. In Great Britain there were 112 launchers of American Tomahawks, in Italy — 112, in the Netherlands — 16. 
Perestroika, and then the collapse of the socialist bloc and the USSR, it would seem, ended the Cold War. with nuclear warheads. At the same time, NATO representatives publicly stated that their bloc was aimed solely at ensuring peace. On December 13, 2001, US President George Bush Jr. Germany was considered as a possible aggressor in case the militarists returned to power, but first of all, the USSR was considered as an enemy. A new round
The Cuban Missile Crisis had a positive moment — there was some sobering up in the West, which later resulted in detente in the 1970s, when several important strategic arms limitation treaties were signed at once. The first Secretary General of NATO Ismay Hastings formulated the purpose of the organization's existence rather succinctly: “Keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans — inside, and the Germans — in a subordinate position. In fact, it was an announcement that Russia intends to protect its interests and its citizens. But no one threatened Russia,», — declared at the UN General Assembly US President Joe Biden. As for the 40 million victims, the Americans were not sure — they made them dependent on the level of resistance offered by the Soviet side. Alas, there was no sobering up in the West. According to the Dropshot plan, only the first phase of the US atomic attack was supposed to take 20 million human lives. On the contrary, it is a serious provoking factor that reduces the level of mutual trust. But by the end of the decade, everything started all over again. The same topic was also discussed at the talks with US President Bill Clinton. The plan included two detailed lists of more than a thousand targets, each in the territory of the USSR and its friendly countries, which were to be hit with nuclear weapons. By 1987, 108 Pershing-2 missile launchers were deployed in West Germany. After the atomic attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by order of US President Harry Trumanin the fall of 1945, the development of the “Totality” plan began. But that was only the beginning. On March 17, 1948, five Western European states — Belgium, UK, Luxembourg, Netherlands and France — concluded the so-called Brussels Pact, the key provision of which was the creation of “collective self-defense”. In addition, it was supposed to strike with conventional bombs, which were supposed to be dropped on the heads of Soviet citizens by 250 thousand tons. But there is one caveat. It provided for an atomic attack on 20 Soviet cities, including Moscow and Leningrad, large industrial centers, as well as a number of capitals of the Union republics. Plot World History with Andrey Sidorchik

Western leaders have launched a series of statements that boil down to one — there is no threat to Russia's security from representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance. 179 nuclear strikes on Moscow
In 2015, the United States declassified plans for nuclear strikes on the USSR, drawn up by the US Strategic Air Command (SAC) in 1956. In the same 1949, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff approved the Dropshot plan, according to which 300 atomic bombs were to be dropped on 100 largest cities and industrial centers of the USSR. The bloc included not only the former socialist countries, but also the former republics of the USSR: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. And why in new countries — NATO members find themselves at the helm of politics not only with an agenda that is not neutral, but openly hostile to Moscow? In 2017, Putin recalled this as follows: “During the discussion, I said:“ Maybe look at the option that Russia will join NATO. Why did the US withdraw from the ABM Treaty? I do not rule out such a possibility — in the event that the interests of Russia will be considered, if it is a full partner. Clinton replied, “I don't mind.” But the entire delegation was very nervous.”
In 2004, the so-called “fifth enlargement of NATO” took place. As conceived by American strategists, civilian objects also fell into the number of targets. Where are these statements now?.. and 64 Tomahawk missile launchers. The reverse side of the Caribbean crisis: what was Comrade Khrushchev wrong about? Thus, the situation can be returned to 1945, when the first plans for unpunished atomic aggression against our country were being developed, which provided for the destruction of tens of millions of people, followed by occupation. In 1961, by order of US President John F. And we have a fair right to ask frankly: who is this expansion against? Lost Illusions
However, the alliance has not gone away. The main advantage of medium-range missiles is the minimum time to reach the target. The second — NATO armed aggression against Yugoslavia, which resulted in the separation of the province of Kosovo. The flight time of American missiles from Turkey was less than 10 minutes. We are your friends! The document stated: “The North Atlantic Treaty Organization would cease to be a closed military grouping of states, it would be open to the accession of other European countries, which, along with the creation of an effective system of collective security in Europe, would be of paramount importance for strengthening world peace.”
The West's answer was exhaustive: “The unrealistic nature of the proposal is not worth discussing.” 
On May 9, 1955, West Germany was admitted to NATO. In 1979, the NATO Council decided to deploy more than 500 American medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads in Europe. But in the United States, an incredible hysteria began at the thought that not only they could threaten destruction. The plan for the destruction of the Soviet Union from the Commander of the Order “Victory”
The last salvos of the war with the Nazis had not yet died down, and the Prime Minister of Great Britain Winston Churchill had already given the order to the Joint Planning Staff of the War Cabinet about preparing a plan code-named “The Unthinkable” — operations against the Red Army in Europe. The Soviet Union, which was initially declared a threat to NATO, did not become, and, therefore, the existence of the North Atlantic Alliance lost its meaning. Therefore, the actions of the USSR were in fact only an equivalent response. Kennedy, 15 American PGM-19 Jupiter medium-range missiles were deployed near the Turkish city of Izmir. After the destruction of Soviet military airfields, as well as command posts, which, according to the authors of the plan, should have led to the impossibility of a retaliatory strike, it was planned to move on to the second part of — destruction of the industrial centers of the USSR in order to destroy the military industry of the Soviet Union. The attack was to begin on July 1, 1945. According to him, after the victory of the United States, Russia:

should not be so militarily strong as to threaten its neighbors;
must grant broad autonomy to national minorities;
must be economically dependent on the outside world;
must not establish a new Iron Curtain. In the same place, the new British Prime Minister Liz Truss said: “No one threatens Russia.”
In general, if you believe these words, our country is surrounded exclusively by pacifists, and the security threat &mdash ; this is purely Russian paranoia. However, the British generals announced to Churchill — the success of the attack cannot be guaranteed. That is, in violation of all previous agreements of the countries — members of the anti-Hitler coalition made the country that initiated the Second World War a member of the military bloc. Within the framework of the military plans of the United States, atomic strikes on the territory of the Soviet Union were supposed to be carried out from military bases located in the allied countries of the United States in Europe and Asia. The idea of ​​a neutral status for a united Germany remained an idea — the former socialist GDR actually became part of NATO. “Putin says he had to act because Russia was threatened.


Clinton recalled conversations with Yeltsin about NATO expansion

Yeltsin answered in the negative
Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin, 1997
Former US leader Bill Clinton (1993-2001; 42nd President of the United States) spoke in an interview with CNN about a conversation with his Russian counterpart Boris Yeltsin about NATO's eastward advance. “This is only three less than all the meetings between the leaders of the USA and the USSR from 1943 to 1991. He recalled that in December 2021, Moscow once again tried to negotiate with the United States and its allies, but “all in vain.” The head of state called “further expansion of the infrastructure of the North Atlantic Alliance, the military development of the territories of Ukraine” unacceptable. «I will repeat— deceived, and in popular language, they just threw it,— said, in particular, Putin in an address on February 24, the day the Russian military operation in Ukraine began. He said he asked the Russian president if he really considered the possibility of the United States striking Russia. He called untrue claims that the United States in any way tried to isolate Russia, showed disrespect or completely ignored it. “The problem is that in the territories adjacent to us, — I note that in our own historical territories, & mdash; a hostile “anti-Russia” is being created, which is placed under complete external control, is intensively settled by the armed forces of the NATO countries and is pumped up with the most modern weapons, — he said then. The former American leader does not believe that NATO expansion, which began during his presidency, can be blamed for the outbreak of hostilities in Ukraine. He stressed that the US and NATO were not going to threaten Russia. Authors Tags The Central Bank lowered the rate: what will happen to loans and deposits
Understanding the newsletter

Источник In 2017, Putin, in an interview with American director Oliver Stone, said that it was he who suggested that Clinton think about Russia joining NATO. Moreover, according to him, he offered Russia “not only a special partnership with NATO, but also the prospect of possible NATO membership.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that NATO countries have not kept promises not to expand “not one inch”; to the East. The former US president then asked his Russian colleague whether he really admits the possibility that the United States will strike at Russia. The fact that Washington offered Yeltsin and Putin the possibility of Russia joining NATO, Clinton spoke back in the spring. At the same time, the former American leader agreed that the alliance really sought to expand eastward, despite Moscow's objections, calling NATO's actions at that time “correct and consistent decisions.”
Read on RBC Pro Pro “I found out about my resignation by phone”: the head of Adidas on turns in his career greens: how Europe is returning to fossil fuels Articles Pro How to open a Russian bank account in a foreign bank Instructions Pro Theory U: how to make the right decisions in business and life Articles Pro Why night snacks are dangerous not only for the figure Studies Pro “Eat, move, sleep”: how simple rules will help you live longer
Clinton said that he met with Yeltsin 18 times, and with Putin— five. The notion that we have ignored, disrespected, or tried to isolate Russia is false,” — he noted. “I asked him, 'Do you really think I'm going to use a base in Poland to bomb Russia?' He replied: “No, but many in Russia think so because their historical memory includes Hitler and Napoleon.”

Clinton acknowledged this, but noted that historical ideas about Russia, in turn, is associated with such rulers as Ivan the Terrible, Peter I and Catherine II, when the Russian state “controlled its neighbors.” However, the ex-president is convinced, “people no longer want to be controlled,” they want to choose their own path.


NATO said it began discussing strengthening defense a few years ago

NATO countries will train and finance these forces for the defense of certain territories in the east, and heavy equipment and weapons will be deployed on the border with Russia. The new NATO Strategic Concept adopted at the summit calls Russia “the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.”

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the bloc had been preparing for a confrontation with Russia since 2014 and the military operation in Ukraine did not come as a surprise to him. The alliance at the end of June decided to increase the number of rapid reaction forces by eight times and deploy heavy equipment near the borders of Russia. “We are talking about the biggest reorganization of our military structures since 1949. “Therefore, we increased our military presence in the east of the alliance and NATO began to invest more money in defense,” — he explained. creator of the Roblox gaming platform Articles Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник Until 2014, it was planned that the scale of such forces would not exceed a division and amount to about 13,000 servicemen. According to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, the decisions of the NATO summit in Madrid fix the course for aggressive containment of Russia, but will not affect Russian policy, and Moscow “in any case” will ensure its safety. According to the head of the Military Committee, NATO is implementing what it planned a few years ago =”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >
Rob Bauer
NATO started planning for a stronger defense a few years ago, Admiral Rob Bauer, head of the alliance's military committee, told a press conference. Is it worth investing in public debt? We started planning this a few years ago, but now we are implementing it,— he said. Read on RBC Pro Pro Which design method helped the iPhone beat the Blackberry OFZ. At the NATO summit in Madrid at the end of June, the leaders of the alliance countries agreed in 2023 to increase the number of rapid reaction forces by almost eight times— up to 300 thousand people.


Foreign Affairs: The appearance of NATO soldiers in Ukraine could provoke a nuclear conflict

“In the event that NATO troops appear in the air, on land or the Black Sea, this may push the Russian field commander to take actions that will lead to the death or injury of soldiers of the North Atlantic Alliance. According to the authors of the article, at the moment, the United States, together with its allies, is trying to prevent any kind of escalation of the conflict that could provoke a direct conflict between the alliance and Russia. The worst scenario of which could be a nuclear war,” the newspaper notes. Photo:
The American magazine Foreign Affairs reported that the appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine could lead to the outbreak of a nuclear war. The authors of the magazine urged to avoid this scenario at all costs and pointed out that Western countries are now increasingly supplying Ukraine with modern weapons and intelligence data.< /p>
Источник The appearance of NATO troops on the territory of Ukraine may lead to the start of a nuclear war. This would be followed by an immediate NATO response, potentially starting a cycle of escalation.


Yeni Şafak learned about Turkey’s appeal to NATO because of the threat of Greek S-300s

on which the Greek islands in the Aegean, as well as Crete, are depicted as Turkish. Relations between the countries have deteriorated sharply in the past few months due to a dispute over the status of the islands in the eastern Aegean, which passed to Greece following the Lausanne Treaty of 1923. Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник He stressed that there were no conditions yet for improving relations with Turkey. After that, Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias said that the country fears the consequences of the rise of nationalism in Turkish society. When we pointed this out, we were told: “Not used, stored in hangars, used only in exercises.” But it turned out that this was not true,»,— indicated the interlocutor of the publication. Greece and Turkey have been members of NATO since February 1952. “We are under pressure on the S-400, but Greece is actively using the S-300. The countries continued to argue about the delimitation of territorial waters and airspace, and Turkey made claims to Greece because of armaments on the islands. Then the island was divided between the predominantly Greek and Turkish population. Yeni Şafak: Turkey will turn to NATO because of Greece's use of the S-300 against the F-16 S-300, although she assured that she uses them only in exercises (max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="Yeni Şafak found out about Turkey's accession to NATO because of the threat of Greek -300" />
Anti-aircraft missile system S-300
Ankara intends to appeal to NATO in connection with the fact that the Greek military aimed a missile system from the S-300 system at the F-16 aircraft of the Turkish Air Force, Yeni Şafak reports, citing a high-ranking source in the Turkish Ministry of Defense. < p>According to source Yeni Şafak, data on the incident will be discussed with Turkish colleagues in NATO and with the United States. On August 28, CNN T & uuml; rk reported, citing sources in the Turkish Ministry of Defense, that the Greek side on the island of Crete used S-300 air defense systems to capture and escort Turkish F-16 reconnaissance aircraft. However, after the conflict between the countries in Cyprus in the mid-1970s, Greece decided to withdraw from the military bloc. The country again became a member of the alliance only in 1980.


NATO reported a good harvest of honey

Each hive produces between 80 and 100 kg of honey per season, some of which is left to support the life of the bees. The first two hives appeared in April 2020, so far their number has doubled. “Today, most of the honey produced is sold at the NATO charity bazaar in favor of supporting some local and international projects” , — the message says. Rate the material
Источник NATO called the experiment on placing bee hives on the territory of the headquarters and obtaining honey as part of the green initiative a success. It was previously reported that Chinese scientists have learned to control the flight of a bee using electrodes in the brain.


The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the United States and NATO

President Vladimir Putin called its goals the denazization and demilitarization of the neighboring country, as well as the protection of the population of Donbass from “genocide”; from Kyiv. “Our Armed Forces are equipped with modern and high-precision conventional (non-nuclear. Russia announced the start of a military special operation in Ukraine on the morning of February 24th. At the same time, the document notes that the alliance does not seek confrontation and does not pose a threat to Russia, and is also ready to keep channels of communication with Moscow open, despite the fact that it no longer considers it a partner. This is not the first time the Russian leadership has accused NATO of an aggressive policy towards Moscow. Against the backdrop of a special operation, the heads of state— members of the North Atlantic Alliance at the end of June adopted a new NATO strategic concept, in which Russia is called the most significant and direct threat to the security of the bloc. or goods that are stuck in Europe Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed Articles Pro “I left the boss humiliated”: how to deal with toxicity at work inaction: what happens to us in a dream quality of your life

Источник Nechaev stressed that “Russia has never saber-rattled, let alone nuclear.” At the same time, according to him, due to the supply of the “regime in Kyiv” clashes between Russia and the forces of the collective West are quite real. < img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the US and NATO" />< /p>
Russia is not interested in a direct clash with the United States and NATO countries, said Ivan Nechaev, Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In particular, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the bloc was conducting a “hot military operation”; against Russia on the territory of Ukraine. — RBC) weapons, which allow us to fully implement the goals and tasks set by the President of Russia for the purposes of the NMD in Ukraine. Russia, as a nuclear power, will continue to act as responsibly as possible, a direct clash with the United States and NATO is not in our interests, — he said. Putin called the expansion of NATO to the East one of the reasons for holding the NWO in Ukraine. Read on RBC Pro Pro Will investors be able to make money on people's desire to hide on the Web? Ukraine, in response, severed diplomatic relations with Moscow and declared martial law.


NATO’s eastern flank countries urge the US to speed up the supply of weapons to them

At the end of July, Pentagon departmental publication Stars and Stripes wrote that the United States was going to send fifth-generation Boeing F-22 Raptor fighters to Poland in support of NATO's mission to air cover the alliance's eastern flank. The NATO countries in the new Strategic Concept recognized Russia as “the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region.” The bloc will continue to counter the “Russian threats”, its “irresponsible rhetoric” and respond to “her hostile actions.”
In the spring, the US announced plans to deploy two Patriot batteries to Poland “in a proactive manner to counter any potential threats to the US, allied forces, and NATO territory.” The batteries will be transferred under Article 5 on NATO collective defense (which means that an attack on one of the NATO members will be considered an attack on all NATO members). Poland is expecting US Patriot, HIMARS, F-16 fighter jets and Abrams tanks. «HIMARS [US multiple launch rocket systems], Reaper [attack drones], counter-battery radars— this is what we will need most in terms of the lethal combat power that will inevitably be required to contain Russia, — Estonian Defense Ministry Chancellor Kusti Salm said in an interview with the newspaper. Video
Authors Tags

Источник Washington Post: Baltic and Eastern European countries are asking the United States to expedite the supply of weapons to them So, Estonia wants to receive MLRS HIMARS and Reaper attack drones, and Poland is waiting for ordered anti-aircraft missile systems Patriot, HIMARS, F-16 fighters and Abrams tanks
Eastern flank countries NATO is demanding more troops and more weapons to contain Russia, writes The Washington Post. The Kremlin noted that the “romantic period” in relations with NATO was replaced by everyday work. Read on RBC Pro Pro “Let's start tomorrow”: how to help a procrastinator speed up Instructions Pro How to get money from the sale of real estate in Russia while abroad Instructions Pro “The subtle art of giving a damn”: how to stop following imposed goals Summary Pro “Mom, why are we like this poor?”: how to answer uncomfortable questions from children Pro instructions “We just got canceled”: how Russian companies are being canceled in the West Pro articles Who are inverse paranoids and why they succeed Articles Pro The most important tax amendments that will appear in the fall of 2022 Articles
At the end of June, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced that the bloc was going to increase the rapid reaction force from 40,000 to 300,000 by 2023. That's how we treated NATO, that's how we treat NATO,” — said the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov. About 100,000 US troops are stationed across Europe, but the “more vulnerable” US allies consider this insufficient, the newspaper notes. This week, the US mission to NATO announced that members of the US Army's elite 101st Airborne Division, known as the “Screaming Eagles”, will be transferred to Europe to strengthen the eastern flank. At the same time, Polish officials believe that the defense of the republic would be helped if the United States accelerated the supply of weapons that had already been promised to Warsaw. NATO cannot perform any other functions simply by its very nature. At the same time, noted the coordinator for strategic communications of the National Security Council (NSC) John Kirby, Russia has no reason to consider the buildup of NATO troops on the eastern flank as a provocation. and coastal defense, which are usually not available to countries with a modest budget. The Baltic and Eastern European countries are asking the United States to increase defense production to speed up the implementation of orders for weapons. “Working days, so to speak, routine relations, lie in the fact that NATO, as it was created and conceived as an instrument of confrontation, it still performs these functions. Meanwhile, Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks told reporters that his country wants modern long-range rocket artillery as well as air defense systems. They will be stationed at the 32nd Tactical Air Base near the Polish city of Lask.


In Moscow, they announced a strike on the arsenal of NATO ammunition in Ukraine

In addition, Russian aviation, rocket troops and artillery attacked three command posts of Ukrainian forces in the DPR, as well as troops and equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 173 districts. p>
Earlier, the Ministry of Defense reported on the seizure of weapons in the Izyum direction, including foreign ones. At the request of Roskomnadzor, RBC provides data on the details of the military operation in Ukraine based on information from Russian official sources. Among them— weapons manufactured in the UK, USA, Poland, Sweden, including Javelin man-portable anti-tank missile systems and Carl Gustaf machine guns, as well as heavy machine guns and Soviet-made small arms abandoned by the Ukrainian military. Tags RBC Comfort
Mailing from news that
affects the quality of your life

Источник Ministry of Defense: an arsenal with 45 thousand tons of NATO ammunition was destroyed in the Nikolaev region “image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< source srcset=" 590w" type="image/webp" >
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation < p>Near the city of Voznesensk, Mykolaiv region of Ukraine, a warehouse was destroyed, which stored 45,000 tons of ammunition supplied by NATO countries for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported. The launcher of the Buk-M1 air defense system, five ammunition depots were destroyed. The department published a video with captured weapons.


“The US and NATO countries killed our children, women, old people”

The assault on the thermal power plant, according to “Serb”, was indeed a very difficult task. According to the “Serb”, if it were not for the support of artillery, the assault on the TPP could hardly have been successful. – They began to work very smoothly. During the special operation, he took part in the assault on the city of Svetlodarsk, where our troops broke through the enemy's defenses. We would not have been able to simply enter the open field with all our desire. Thanks to them. – Recently, our unit has liberated the Uglegorsk TPP, we are moving forward according to plan. – My military path began with Debaltseve, then served and settled in the Luhansk People's Republic. The man is indeed from Serbia. A few days ago, I had the opportunity to meet a native of the Congo, who is participating in a special military operation in the ranks of the Chechen unit “Akhmat”. – The United States and NATO countries killed our children, women, old people. It was this parallel with the suffering experienced from one’s own experience that became the key moment for making a decision, perhaps strange in the eyes of others, the interlocutor shares. Donetsk, DPR. According to the interlocutor, it was the most difficult battle since the start of the special operation. – The guys worked very professionally. A Balkan volunteer told why he is fighting for the DPR
The more time you spend in Donbas, the more you realize how many interesting people who are not indifferent to its fate are attracted to this region. This has never happened before. He says that if we compare the enemy, who was eight years ago, and the one that is now, the difference is visible to the naked eye. – The enemy artillery worked without interruption. At the end of 2014, he came as a volunteer to the Donbass and after eight years, as the military himself admits, this land and its people became dear to him. As you might guess, the call sign of the serviceman was not chosen by chance. – I didn't even know how to assemble or disassemble a machine gun. – No. My home is here. They came under fire from the Ukrainian armed forces. The mentors were good, real experts. Источник It was a huge loss, but we still reached Svetlodarsk. The Serb admits that he had no military training, let alone combat experience, until 2014. Unfortunately, then we lost the battalion commander and the company commander. I learned everything here when I came. About two thousand shells were fired at the approaches to the station. The fortifications, pillboxes and dugouts, equipped by the Ukrainian military, were filled with concrete and practically looked like an impregnable fortress. Platoon commander of the infantry battalion of the operational group “Delta” of the People's Militia of the LPR with the call sign “Serb”. After all, it can “power up” the entire Donbass with electricity. It shouldn’t be like this. And here is a new acquaintance. – But we have excellent artillery, – the military man says not without pride. And most likely, it would have dragged on for a long time. According to the serviceman, the TPP was a very significant strategic point. And one of them, I'm talking about Ukraine now, just started killing defenseless people…
According to the “Serb”, he already saw everything that was happening in the Donbass in his country in 1999, when people sat under carpet bombing for 90 days. During this time, I have already become a citizen of the Russian Federation, and I am going to stay in the Donbass. When asked why a citizen of another country suddenly had a desire to stand on defense of Donbass, “Serb” answers what motivated him first of all by the desire to help the Slav brothers:
– Here in 2014 there was not just a civil war, it was a clash of two large countries.


Assessed the likelihood of an armed conflict in Kosovo: what is the role of NATO

– No matter where, but the culprit has already been identified. As noted by Serbian publications, bells rang continuously in all churches and monasteries of Northern Kosovo, just like in 1999 before the bombing Yugoslavia. According to experts, nothing much is happening now, and any new round of tension in the region is perceived as an ordinary situation that occurs once a year for the past five years. This escalation is no surprise to anyone. Based on such a scenario, the position of Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić is understandable, who, in an address to nation said that “Serbia will pray for peace, but if the persecution continues, Serbia will win.”
Recall that the autonomous province of Kosovo and Metohija declared independence from Serbia in February 2008. Therefore, each new escalation increases the risk of an armed conflict. However, a repetition of the events of the late nineties is hardly to be expected. Yes, and the flair of the events of 23 years ago, which was frighteningly similar to the situation last night, is present. The current tension does not come from Serbia, but Belgrade is forced to respond to the actions of Pristina. – There are more and more cases of mobilization of troops, that is, the pulling of the army to the borders. The escalation of the conflict, according to Alexander Pivovarenko, will lead to a scenario of punishing Serbia. The actions of Pristina then led to violent clashes between the police and Serbs entering the territory with Belgrade license plates. The help of Russia, which sent Pantsir complexes to Belgrade, extinguished the situation and brought life in the region to relative normality. The remaining states did not recognize or remained neutral regarding the independence of the republic. The Serbs living in the region again began to feel discrimination from the authorities of Pristina. The viscosity of the conflict, however, has not disappeared. One of the main reasons is the refusal of the Pristina authorities to accept Serbian documents and the issuance of a temporary permit to enter the Kosovo territory. The situation escalated until weaning not only private cars, but also special ones. The world community should not be afraid of a large-scale armed clash, taking into account Pristina's delay in adopting the rule for replacing Serbian license plates with Kosovo ones, for the time being. NATO's interest in Pristina is also confirmed by experts. The situation is really ordinary. The appearance of victims, even by chance, will lead to irreversible events, and in the end Serbia will be declared the culprit, no matter what happens. “For the forces of the Alliance, the repetition of past events is a scripted operation”
The night from July 31 to August 1 was marked for the Balkan Peninsula by a new round of tension between Serbia and self-proclaimed Kosovo. But this would lead to some kind of coercion of Belgrade. Alarm sirens sound in Kosovo, citizens prepare barricades: eyewitness videos
Watch related videos

Источник According to expert assessment, such a scenario is possible if events at the border itself or somewhere else go according to a bad scenario. Now Serbia is also accused of its diplomatic position of cooperation with Russia, which, as it were, violates European discipline. The events of September 2021, when the Kosovo authorities required Serbs living there to issue temporary Kosovo license plates, are similar to the current ones. To date, 98 states have recognized Kosovo's independence. In 2013, the process of normalizing relations with the government of Kosovo began, but all steps remain ineffective. The Serbian government considers Kosovo its territory. According to Alexander Pivovarenko, senior researcher at the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, interest in new escalations arises from the growing military component of conflicts. It should be noted that back in January 2021, in the foreign expert press, Serbia was called the culprit of a possible conflict in the Balkans, in Bosnia or Kosovo, the expert comments. Therefore, such an action would increase the viability of NATO and show that the bloc is capable of dealing with challenges. The events of last night showed that neither Pristina nor Belgrade will stop at peace agreements if the situation starts to get out of control. – For NATO forces, the repetition of past events – operation with a pre-written script. Photo: Frame
The approach of the day when Serbian license plates will no longer be recognized on the territory of Kosovo caused a wave of protests among the population. The parties have little interest in this, but the risks objectively increase. The Serbian authorities understand this prospect, so there is no interest in escalation. The Kosovo police announced the closure of the checkpoint and the bridge between Serbia and the partially recognized republic.


Wasserman called for the recognition of the US and NATO as sponsors of terrorism

Photo: Lilia Sharlovskaya
V In an interview with, Wasserman, in response to a US Senate resolution, acquitted Russia, noting that the Russian military was directly involved in suppressing terrorist threats in Chechnya, Georgia, Syria and Ukraine, unlike the Americans. The American authorities explain this by Russia's military actions in the territories of Chechnya and Georgia. Read also:Political scientist Ishchenko assessed Kyiv's plans to return liberated territories
Источник Syria and Ukraine. State Duma Deputy Anatoly Wasserman is convinced that the US and NATO themselves should be recognized as sponsors of terrorism. According to According to the parliamentarian, Russia suppressed terrorism with all its might in all the places listed by the Americans, and all normal people around the world “understand this very well.” Moreover, Wasserman stressed that almost all terrorist groups in the world are supported by the Americans, which is also well known to everyone. Americans support almost every terrorist group in the world
The US Senate earlier passed a resolution calling on the State Department to include Russia on the list of state sponsors of terrorism. The politician added that the inclusion of Russia in the list of states sponsoring terrorism could threaten Moscow with the introduction of new sanctions by the White House. The deputy believes that, based on this, it is necessary to recognize the United States and the entire NATO organization as sponsors of terrorism.


Medvedev promised a symmetrical response to Finland’s accession to NATO

In early July, Erdogan reiterated that Turkey would return to its original position on Sweden's membership and Finland in the alliance if he sees “attempts to delay the implementation of the obligations taken or hypocrisy.”
At the same time, Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde called exaggerated fears that Ankara could again block countries from joining the alliance. Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник “As for our reaction to the entry of these countries into NATO, then, as the President of our country said, this reaction will be symmetrical,— he told reporters following a meeting held in Karelia on ensuring Russia's security in the northwestern direction (quote from Interfax). The parties were able to agree on the issue of countries joining NATO, and Ankara agreed to support the candidates. According to the application procedure, all NATO members must approve, but Turkey opposed it. Erdogan subsequently stated that parliament would ratify their applications only after they fulfilled their promises to Ankara. A simple, evidence-based breathing technique for health and sports Summary Pro Which marketplace to enter: comparing the commissions of the main sites Research
On June 28, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan met with Finnish President Sauli Niinistö and Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson. What It Means Articles Pro Oxygen Benefit. Read on RBC Pro Pro Why only 8% of Russians strive for unlimited wealth Studies Pro Parallel import of technology: what is wrong Articles Pro Why investors buy Armenian dram and ignore the Rand of South Africa Articles Pro “I'm like a ninja in a street fight”: Ray Dalio – about the impact Meditation Articles Pro How to avoid mistakes when creating a strategy: cases of Disney, Nike, JC Penny Articles Pro In the US markets, the era of Great Anger is coming. The countries emphasized that the decision was not directed against Moscow and was due to the changed security situation. According to the deputy head of the Security Council, the accession of Sweden and Finland to the alliance will worsen the security situation in the Baltic region, and the border of Karelia with Finland will actually turn into the border of Russia with NATOv6_top_pics/resized/320xH/media/img/3/76/756590232317763.jpg 320w 800xH/media/img/3/76/756590232317763.jpg 800w v6_top_pics/resized/400xH/media/img/3/76/756590232317763.jpg 400w” media=”(max-width: 400px)” >
Dmitry Medvedev
Russia will respond symmetrically to the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO, said Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, without specifying what it was about. In May, against the backdrop of Russia's military operation in Ukraine, Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO. Video
At the same time, the deputy head of the Security Council pointed out that the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO could worsen the security situation in the Baltic region, “because the Baltic Sea is now, in fact, becoming a sea dominated by NATO countries.” Medvedev also noted that now Karelia's border with Finland is becoming Russia's border with NATO. She demanded that the countries hand over to Ankara members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which Turkey considers a terrorist organization, close all organizations associated with the PKK structures, and provide Turkey with guarantees. But it would be unreasonable of me to say that nothing will come up at all,— she said. “I think we've worked so hard on this that we don't have to worry too much about further problems coming up.


The expert predicted what NATO could become under the leadership of Boris Johnson

According to the political scientist, NATO will be “pumped up” as an opponent of Russia, which he considers an enemy of the Alliance. The British prime minister is cynical, and he understands the importance of the public factor, and his eccentricity is only the mainstream and modern political style, and not the “eccentricities” of one character, Minchenko concluded. “The tone will get tougher”
In late July, The Daily Telegraph reported that British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who is retiring, could take over as NATO Secretary General because he is supported by high-ranking members of the Tory party and Ukrainian politicians. Read also:Political scientist appreciated the imposition of US sanctions on China's purchase of Russian oil
Источник In addition, Minchenko noted that the UK is now trying to build an alternative security bloc based on the London-Warsaw-Kyiv axis, so under the leadership of Johnson “the tone will become tougher” than under anyone else. The expert sees no reason why Johnson could not lead NATO, especially since the Alliance is currently experiencing a renaissance. The political scientist explained that the bloc was considered a relic of the past for a long time, and now there is a “gift” in the form of events in Ukraine and the deterioration of relations with Russia. Political scientist, president of the Minchenko Consulting Foundation Yevgeny Minchenko believes that under the leadership of Johnson, the Alliance can become more radical against the backdrop of the “militant and militant” nature of the politician. Nevertheless, the expert stressed that the United States remains the dominant force in NATO, but now one can observe the radical militarization of Europe, as well as the rearmament of Germany and other countries. According to Minchenko, the old weapons are “merge” to Ukraine, and the countries' own weapons fleet is being updated. The political scientist added that Johnson is one of the most professional and experienced politicians. Photo: Global Look Press
In an interview with, Minchenko recalled that Johnson recently held a photo shoot where he holds a grenade launcher on his shoulder, throws a grenade and runs around with a machine gun.


Experts assessed the likelihood of NATO dissolution and the possible consequences of this event

The expert recalled that before there were two NATO blocs, and later only one remained, and if there is not a single one, then everyone will only get better from this. The political scientist predicts that the internal content and principles of interaction in the alliance will soon change. The opinions of domestic experts regarding the dissolution of NATO in a conversation with Vechernyaya Moskva were divided, but experts believe that changes are inevitable anyway. “This is the destruction of a bad tooth”
Bundestag deputy from the Left Party Sevim Dagdelen said on July 18 that EU countries should prepare for the dissolution of the North Atlantic Alliance and start pursuing a policy that is not based on views USA. According to the expert, the dissolution of NATO could be a disaster for the Western world, since the countries are too accustomed to this military bloc, and its elimination will be too painful. He explained that Germany is the main country in the European Union, and the United States has a significant influence on it. According to Markelov, NATO members are tired of US pressure, and they want equality, create their own weapons, strengthen and be on an equal footing. Photo: Global Look Press
Political scientist Dmitry Zhuravlev admits the possibility of the dissolution of the North Atlantic Alliance, but not in the near future. Thus, according to the political scientist, NATO will create protective weapons, and the armies will be set up to maintain the sovereignty of countries, although now they are set up only to violate foreign borders. As Markelov noted, NATO was created on the basis of the illusion of collective security, but the alliance will now align its history under the pressure of secondary states. Read also:The political scientist called the turning point in the special operation in Ukraine
Источник Markelov concluded that the alliance will “transform in all directions”, but this process will be long and difficult. Nevertheless, the specialist believes that the very fact of the emergence of thoughts about the dissolution of NATO is proof that things will go to dissolution. However, the specialist is convinced that the alliance will definitely be “rebooted”, as the mood of its members in the world is changing. Political scientist Sergei Markelov, in turn, believes that the dissolution of NATO is impossible, but the alliance is now experiencing problems and is waiting for a “reset”, which can be expressed in the weakening of US influence. The expert suggests that these countries will insist that the organization deal with security, and not create tense structures around the world. According to Zhuravlev, the liquidation of NATO is the destruction of a sore tooth, due to which the level of political and military tension in the world will drop sharply, which will be a very good outcome, including for Russia. The political scientist stressed that the existence of two blocks of the alliance had a certain stabilizing value, and at the moment there is only a clear call for aggression.


Military equipment of Ukraine and NATO countries turns into Russian trophies

Of course, they said that they gave it from the bottom of their hearts, but in fact they recorded the fact of the transfer of military equipment to the balance of French support for Ukraine. An interesting fact is that the production of the Pinzgauer 712 ceased in 1990, which can serve as another proof that NATO countries are supplying Ukraine with obsolete weapons thirty years ago to be disposed of. It turns out that at the end of a special military operation, willy-nilly, someone will have to pay these amounts, and these are no longer France's problems.”
A curious exhibit of the Patriot park was the Pinzgauer 712 AMB-S off-road vehicle in the version of a medical vehicle. These vehicles are manufactured by the Austrian company Steyr-Daimler-Puch but assembled in the UK. Источник The cost of the all-terrain vehicle seized by Russia can reach up to $100,000. Photos of captured Ukrainian military equipment regularly appear on social networks, and some trophies are exhibited in the Patriot park. Military equipment produced in Ukraine did not escape the fate of the exhibit, for example, patrol boats of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine BG-23 and BG-24 of the UMS-1000 project and BG-309 of the 50030 Kalkan project. Gave away. Photo: < p>Most often, the trophies are left by the Ukrainian armed forces themselves, but there have already been cases when Ukrainian militants sold foreign weapons through the darknet, seeing in the property trade of Western allies another way to make money. The boats of the UMS-1000 project can reach speeds of up to 70 kilometers per hour, and the 50030 Kalkan project is not only 7 kilometers faster, but is also equipped with two machine guns – 12.7 mm and 7.62 mm. Political scientist Satanovsky told why Ukrainians sell European weapons to Russia
Russian troops continue to receive military equipment produced in NATO countries. The well-known Russian political scientist Yevgeny Satanovsky told in his Telegram channel the reason why Ukrainians are selling military equipment to Russia technique. Other foreign trophies were also at the exhibition: Estonian the armored car “Mamba” Mk2 EE, the American cargo van “Humvee” and the British armored personnel carrier AT105 “Saxon”. Yevgeny Satanovsky ironically wrote that France should not worry about selling its military equipment either: “The French gave their self-propelled guns to Zelensky? According to the political scientist, the sale of two French self-propelled guns “Caesar” by soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for $ 120 thousand per unit did not hurt anyone, because Russian artillery would have razed them to the ground along with the crews anyway. Some of the trophies have already been exhibited in Patriot Park near Moscow, where a special exposition has been created for them.


The accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO brought Russia serious risks

Petersburg is turning into a front-line city. – After Poland joined NATO in 1997, all other countries were basically ballast for the alliance. But we also have a good memory, and we remember how in 1706 in Poland the Swedes treated captured Russian soldiers who fought as part of the Saxon army. To prevent this, we will have to seriously strengthen the air and missile defense system there. I have no doubt that Vyborg and half of Karelia will try to “squeeze” us. And now it doesn’t matter at all whether we did it ourselves or were dragged into it. And it will worsen with the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO. The Swedes, for example, make aircraft, including early warning aircraft – air command posts. bad memories for them. Now, against the backdrop of our special operation, the military budgets of these countries will be increased, and in the field of defense they will begin to integrate more closely with the rest of the European countries of NATO. Most countries, including Russia, kept symbolic contingents of their navies there. On July 5, the Foreign Ministers of Sweden and Finland signed the Accession Protocol at NATO Headquarters. Being formally neutral, she took a position hostile to us, helping the Nazis. A naval and missile arms race will now begin in the Baltic. On July 4, negotiations between these countries and the Alliance were completed in Brussels. In this sense, this is, of course, a valuable acquisition for the alliance. However, they were not at least formally integrated into NATO structures, and accordingly, they behaved cautiously and correctly towards us. If they have to fight with us, they will also be very motivated to do it. – I am sure that if there is the slightest opportunity to return their former territories, they will, of course, use such a moment. The Swedes have historically emphasized significant self-sufficiency. And not because these countries suddenly became anti-Russian overnight – even before that they loved us like a dog with a stick. The score is on the scoreboard. This is generally a very serious opponent. At one time there was even such a joke: in order to destroy this organization, it is necessary either for everyone to leave it, or for everyone to join at once. There is no need to have any illusions here. Everything is different there. And at any slightest opportunity, of course, they will try to return it. I think that the Finns probably have largely worked out protocols for suppressing our air defense systems. And if you suddenly forgot, so we can remind you. Photo: Global Look Press
– Of course, this means the deterioration of our strategic position. Both the Swedes and the Finns have already experienced the power of Russian weapons. – Yes, it is observed correctly. One is a military organization. A kind of seatbelt to Washington. So we can't be weak. The Baltic has been largely demilitarized since the 1990s. Their army, relatively speaking, can be called less militant. Not because she fought a lot, but because all her life she was well prepared to fight with us. The other is political, through which the Americans conduct their policy in Europe. The Finns lost it in 1940, then left in 1944. And this fact also makes them very unpleasant opponents. And any xenophobia is most often born out of poverty, when everyone is offended by everyone. Photo:
Despite the fact that Finland formally did not have any territorial claims against Russia, recognized the results of World War II, nevertheless, the Finnish political establishment, and many Finnish citizens, did not forget that the city of Vyborg was once the second largest Finnish city after Helsinki Viipuri. The entry of many newcomers into the Bloc did not give the Alliance anything, since these countries were not security donors. – I agree. Previously, they mainly developed these ties with their neighbors – Norway, Denmark. In general, their military-industrial complex is very developed. Now military cooperation will spread more widely to Europe and the USA, which, of course, is bad for us. And the worst thing is that with the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO, St. After the battle, the Swedes then methodically separated the Russians from the Saxons, after which all our soldiers were stabbed with bayonets right on the spot, thereby committing a war crime. Therefore, now we will simply have to competently maneuver the available opportunities, restrain the unjustified or provocative impulses of these countries. This means that less money will be spent on infrastructure projects, healthcare, and education. Источник – If we talk about the everyday side of the issue, then, of course, the Finns are civilized, rich people. Everything that they lack for their own army, they can buy either in other European countries or in the USA, as the Finns do, buying F-35s there. – It all depends on the situation. – Yes, they have their own military-industrial complex. Now, their joining the Alliance may lead to the fact that their leadership – especially in conditions when governments are changing from more sane to less sane – is able to start provoking us, which will increase the risk of starting a war. – How to say … The Swedes say that they have not forgotten how the troops of Peter I ruled their territory 300 years ago. They remind us of some burned church. In any case, such a move by Stockholm and Helsinki does not lead to anything good. This will force us to invest more financially in the arms race. Let me remind you that the border with Finland is more than a thousand kilometers. The Finns would very much like to return Vyborg
The process of Sweden and Finland joining NATO has continued. NATO, as a military organization, simply swelled from accepting such members, turning into something shapeless and poorly controlled. – Yes, but in addition to aircraft, they also have their own beautiful corvettes, submarines, missiles… In general, both Sweden and Finland are rich countries. They still remember very well how they got hit in the teeth from us. However, the Swedes have the deepest, centuries-old Russophobic traditions. We will have to spend more on defense than before February this year. As Washington dictated its own will through NATO, so it will continue to dictate it. For example, the Finns decided to buy the American F-35 aircraft. And the one who says that their entry into NATO means practically nothing to us, he, I think, is disingenuous. So it is not surprising that the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons in this area is becoming more and more relevant for us. – The Swedes have a smaller army than the Finns. During World War II, Sweden de facto, although not de jure, was ally of Hitler. But it's about politics. The Finns have good tank units. And in which case their army will be very motivated. And then, unlike Finland, we have no land border with the Swedes. So they can cling to us again only if we turn out to be frankly weak. In this second component, by and large, with the entry of these two countries, nothing changes. This puts it at risk, as the Alliance's modern weaponry gives them the ability to strike devastatingly at the city. – The Finnish army is a very powerful combat structure. It's just that two more countries are added to the European list that refuse to pursue a policy independent of the United States. But there are two main components of the NATO structure. Ruslan Pukhov, a military analyst and director of the Moscow Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST), spoke about the military significance of NATO expansion in the northwest. They became consumers of security and could not give anything to the military organization of NATO. On the other hand, the military component of NATO at the expense of Sweden and Finland will experience a noticeable increase. With modern weapons on board, this is a formidable military force that poses a danger, including even to our 5th generation aircraft, which we also currently have in very limited numbers. Everything is pretty serious. In some cases, partial – like Slovakia or the Czech Republic. Excellent infantry. In some cases, a completely frank ballast, like, say, Montenegro, Croatia or Albania. We've already gotten into it. It is quite obvious that in the 25 years since the first wave of NATO expansion, this structure has been growing for the first time not as a liability, but as an asset. True, we had no illusions about these countries before.


Negotiations on Finland’s accession to NATO concluded in Brussels

It is expected that a protocol will be signed on July 5, according to which Finland will become an observer member in NATO. During the talks, Finland was represented by a delegation led by the country's Foreign Minister Pekka Haavisto. Earlier, Finland, as well as Sweden, applied to join NATO. Источник He also plans to be present at the signing of the protocol. Initially, these applications were blocked by Turkey, but subsequently the countries managed to reach an agreement. Photo:
According to the STT news agency, negotiations on Finland's entry into the North Atlantic Alliance have been completed in Brussels.


Named the probability of deploying NATO nuclear weapons in Sweden and Finland

If you have not been involved in terrorist activities, you have nothing to worry about.” Whether such a position will suit Ankara is still difficult to say, given Erdogan's penchant for unexpected political somersaults. I don't think there is even an interest in deploying nuclear weapons or opening NATO bases in Finland.” The ruling Social Democratic Party in Sweden, for its part, announced that it would oppose the deployment of nuclear weapons and military bases of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Sweden. Typically, the ratification process takes about a year – from the signing of the Accession Protocol by current NATO members to the country's accession to the Washington Treaty. Now after signing, the protocol must be ratified by the parliaments of all thirty members block of states so that both countries can become part of NATO. This was announced last week by Alliance Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. Speaking at the annual Almedalen Week political festival in Gotland on Sunday, she added that those who are not involved in terrorist activities have nothing to worry about: “Swedish citizens cannot be extradited in accordance with national and international law. However, this is not yet the finish line in the Scandinavian sprint run, but only one of many milestones on a path that can stretch for a long time. In particular, Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin spoke about this in an interview with the Italian edition of Corriere della Sera: “No one will come to us to impose nuclear weapons or permanent bases on us if we do not want it. So far in Stockholm and Helsinki! On the other hand, it has recently become known that the mayor of a nearby The Russian city of Lappeenranta, Finland, Kimmo Järva, spoke in the spirit that the city would not mind, if necessary, providing the military with its airport as a NATO base. Photo:
“We are going to officially sign the accession protocol on Tuesday in the presence of the foreign ministers of Sweden and Finland, but the decision has already been made,” Stoltenberg said at a press conference on results of the NATO summit in Madrid. The two Nordic countries were officially invited to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization after the signing on June 28 by Turkey, Finland and Sweden of a tripartite memorandum in which Stockholm and Helsinki pledged to fulfill the demands put forward by Ankara. – are firmly trying to assure others that they do not plan to become “bastions” of NATO. “We need a ratification process in 30 parliaments – it always takes some time, but I also expect it to happen quite quickly, because the allies are ready to try to make this ratification process as fast as possible,” Stoltenberg explained during the Madrid summit. The question arises: will the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO entail the emergence of military bases of the Alliance on their territory, near the borders with Russia? And here, for the Swedes and Finns, an “ambush” may arise – taking into account Erdogan’s threats voiced in recent days, not to submit the relevant document for ratification to Turkish legislators if Sweden and Finland do not fulfill the obligations enshrined in the deal with Ankara. Stockholm and Helsinki have a long way to go to NATO
On Tuesday, Sweden and Finland are expected to sign a NATO accession protocol. However, no one can give any guarantees that bases and nuclear weapons will not appear on Finnish or Swedish soil. Moreover, in the past, the Americans have deployed their nuclear warheads in non-NATO countries (for example, in Asia). True, the Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson promised to comply with the agreement concluded with Turkey, including the obligation to extradite the terrorists. As for the possibility of deploying nuclear weapons in Sweden or Finland, the entry of certain countries into NATO does not automatically mean sending weapons of mass destruction there. Swedish and Finnish forces may also be involved in NATO operations around the world, for example, in the Baltic countries, where multinational military contingents are stationed at several bases. Applicants must formally commit to membership, and then the current Member States sign the Protocol of Accession before individually ratifying this document in their legislatures. Although Jens Stoltenberg, following the results of the “historic » agreement stated that it expects Sweden and Finland to quickly become members of a military alliance, a formal invitation from NATO launches the accession process, consisting of a number of steps. In particular, former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt told CNN that he does not foresee the construction of new large military bases either in Sweden or in Finland if they join the Alliance. But if the Swedes and Finns manage to overcome all obstacles, and they become members of the Alliance, then Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty will apply to them, according to which all signatory parties consider an attack on one member of the organization as an attack on all. So far – and this is again the key word – there are signals from the West that The North Atlantic Alliance does not intend to deploy nuclear weapons or permanent bases in the territories of new members. Key milestones along the way include negotiations between NATO and candidate countries. And will these Nordic countries develop nuclear weapons? Источник NATO optimists, however, believe that given the Ukrainian crisis, Finland and Sweden could be accepted as soon as possible. Yes, it looks like it won't even try. However, realists point to the unpredictability of Turkey's behavior, which, as Erdogan openly promises, can block the process at the ratification stage in the Turkish parliament. If (or when) parliamentarians in all current NATO countries give the green light to expansion, candidate countries will be formally invited to join to the Washington Treaty, the founding document of the Alliance. Joining the bloc is likely to mean more joint military training and planning between Finland, Sweden and the 30 current NATO members, he said.


The United States was convicted of plans to create an analogue of NATO in Asia

In Pyongyang, this agreement was called part of the US plan to create a NATO-like military alliance in the region. Due to the reckless military intrigues of the United States and its satellites, a dangerous situation has developed, fraught with the simultaneous outbreak of nuclear war in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. – Also, the US and its satellites have also recorded in the new “strategic concept” adopted at the NATO summit, a hostile phrase that finds fault with our self-protective measures to strengthen defense capabilities. Washington's main partners in new military bloc in the Far East named
The United States is seeking an excuse for an “Asian NATO” with South Korea and Japan, North Korea says. North Korea is conducting missile tests at an unprecedented pace this year, Reuters said, and some observers believe the DPRK is preparing for another nuclear test. Relations between Seoul and Tokyo have deteriorated to their worst levels under former South Korean President Moon Jae-in, over spats over territorial disputes and historical grievances. This was stated by a representative of the North Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in response to a question posed by the KCNA, the state news agency reported on Sunday. The new South Korean president, Yoon Suk Yeol, nevertheless expressed a desire to restore relations with the Land of the Rising Sun, and Prime Minister Fumio Kishida also seems to have reacted positively to the signals coming from Seoul. “At this NATO summit, it has become clearer,” the North Korean diplomat continued, “that the United States is trying to simultaneously contain and encircle Russia and China by “militaryizing” Europe and “turning the Asia-Pacific region into a NATO region,” and considers a tripartite military alliance US – Japan – South Korea an important vehicle for their implementation. Reality clearly shows that the real purpose of dragging the United States into the “North Korean threat” version is to create a pretext for establishing hegemony not only in the Asia-Pacific region, including the Korean Peninsula, but throughout the world. Against this background, Pyongyang speaks of the urgent need to build up its defense capability. Photo: AP
Agreement between the United States, South Korea and Japan to strengthen military cooperation was criticized by the DPRK. The leaders of the three countries said they would explore additional means to strengthen “extended deterrence” against Pyongyang. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. And it has brought global peace and security to the gravest crisis since the end of the Cold War. “During the recent NATO summit, the rulers of the United States, Japan and South Korea, in an anti-Republican confrontation collusion, rashly quibbled over the exercise of our fair rights to self-defense and discussed highly dangerous joint military retaliation aimed at us, including trilateral joint military exercises,” KCNA quoted the representative as saying. “The deterrent capabilities of the Japan-US and US-ROK alliances should be improved as part of an important effort to strengthen the trilateral partnership between Japan, the United States and the Republic of Korea,” said Japanese Prime Minister Kishida. Источник US President Joe Biden, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol met on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Madrid last week and shared the view that the progress of North Korea's nuclear and missile programs poses a serious threat not only to the Korean Peninsula, but to also to East Asia and the world, according to Reuters. Meanwhile, as Reuters recalls, relations between Japan and South Korea have long been complicated by difficult memories of the horrors of the Japanese occupation of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945. “The current situation highlights the urgency of strengthening the national defense capability to actively respond to the trend towards a sharp deterioration in the situation on the Korean Peninsula and ensure international security,” the North Korean official added.


Who and why NATO considered its threats. Video


Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник NATO was created by the United States and European countries in 1949. Who did NATO consider a threat – in the RBC video. In the latest strategy, the bloc named Russia as the main threat. Since then, the alliance has repeatedly expanded – now it already has 30 states.


Peskov responded to NATO statements about a possible victory over Russia

According to him, this process is an aggressive military construction. It recognizes Russia as “the most significant and direct threat” security. NATO leaders at the summit in Madrid approved a new strategic concept for the alliance until 2030. According to Peskov, it is better to talk about something more constructive. Источник Meanwhile, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko said that NATO was starting a new arms race. So he answered the question of journalist Pavel Zarubin, who asked to respond to the statements of the NATO countries that spoke about the military way to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. He demands “mandatory demonization of the enemy”, as Grushko said. Photo:
The Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Western countries “gravitate towards the apocalypse”. Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo later noted that Russia could allegedly be defeated “only on the battlefield.” In this regard, he called on the leaders of the alliance states to support Ukraine. He added that it was to be hoped that “some political will and some political reason still remained at least partially in the collective West.” The Kremlin speaker stressed that this mind is fully preserved in Russia.


Grushko says NATO questioned China’s right to development

NATO explained that China is challenging the interests, security and values ​​of the West, and also seeks to undermine the international order. Deputy Foreign Minister Grushko: NATO questioned China's right to development =”Grushko said NATO questioned China's right to development” />
NATO questioned China's right to development when it called the country a threat. He considered that the announcement of Russia as the main threat— this is “a real bid for confrontation, containment of Russia on all fronts.” According to him, Moscow will assess the situation from a political and military point of view in order to ensure the interests of Russia's security and defense capability. The alliance called Russia the main military threat, and put China in second place. “This is primarily an indicator that NATO is globalizing, NATO declares the whole world a zone interests and, in fact, calls into question the right of China to develop as one of the poles of the already established multipolar world, — said Grushko. He considered that NATO went beyond the original mandate, as it should be engaged in maintaining security in the North Atlantic region, and not in the Pacific. A Global Economy That Powers Progress, People, and the Planet Summary Pro Living to 120: Why a PayPal Co-Founder Takes Growth Hormone Articles Pro Paleo Diet. Eat what nature intended to lose weight and improve health Summary Pro Tax disputes: what to pay attention to right now companies. At the summit in Madrid on June 28 & ndash; 30 June, NATO adopted a new strategy, a document on reforming the alliance until 2030. This was stated by Deputy Head of the Russian Foreign Ministry Alexander Grushko at a discussion in the international club “Valdai”, RBC correspondent reports. Step-by-step instructions Instructions
Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник In response, Chinese Foreign Minister Zhao Lijian said that NATO itself poses a “systemic challenge to peace and stability.” He noted that the bloc positions itself as a regional defense organization, but continues to expand, “unleashing wars everywhere and killing civilians.”
Read on RBC Pro Pro How to distinguish a conflicting candidate for an interview: 7 signs Manipulators and Toxic People Instructions Pro Participatory Capitalism.


The Foreign Ministry called the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO the saddest episode

“We have nothing to worry about in terms of Finnish and Swedish membership in NATO. He stressed that Russia has no territorial disputes with Finland and Sweden, but their accession to NATO— it is “a very significant shift.” “It will be a new military-political reality that will influence our military planning process. Only they should clearly and clearly imagine that before there were no threats to them, and now, if military contingents and infrastructure are deployed there, we will have to respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats for the territories from which threats are created to us, — he said following the results of the Caspian summit on June 29. Finland and Sweden applied to join NATO in mid-May amid the Russian military operation in Ukraine. “This will most seriously worsen the situation in the Baltic Sea region, which, as a result of NATO expansion, the military development of the territory of new members from the most militarily calm region, will turn into an arena, well, if not a military confrontation, then definitely a military rivalry,” — said Grushko. President Vladimir Putin said earlier that the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO does not cause concern for Moscow. What we considered unimportant and insignificant remains in the past. This is 1300 km, so it is necessary to place troops, weapons and so on there. All this will lead to a deterioration in regional security, to significant threats to complicate the situation in the north,— continued the deputy minister. The accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO will make the Baltic Sea region a zone of rivalry, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko warned /42/756566855456426.jpg” alt=”The Foreign Ministry called the entry of Finland and Sweden into NATO the saddest episode” />
The expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance by joining Finland and Sweden will lead to a deterioration in regional security and turn the Baltic region seas into the zone of military rivalry, said Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Alexander Grushko. They want to [join NATO]— please. Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник Now we will deal with a situation where potentials can be placed along our borders and at a fairly shallow depth that will threaten the military security of Russia, — he said. However, Turkey has blocked the process of joining the two countries to the alliance. He added that he did not understand the motives that led these two countries to join the alliance, and that they were essentially “turning into NATO's periphery.”
“If we follow the logic of the Madrid decisions, then after this accession is finalized, NATO will start talking about the fact that the biggest vulnerability— this is the Russian-Finnish border, which must be protected. He noted that Russia would take measures to ensure its own security. Stockholm and Helsinki have officially received the status of countries invited to NATO. Now their entry will have to be approved by the parliaments of 30 countries— members of the military-political bloc. “The expansion of NATO, the entry of Finland and Sweden there” is, in my opinion, the saddest episode in the evolution of European security, “— said Grushko, speaking on the sidelines of the Valdai Club on July 1. He noted that such a development of events will narrow the possibilities for peaceful cooperation, which, according to him, is now in great demand in this part of Europe and the world. During a separate meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Madrid, which took place from June 28 to 30, the three countries managed to reach a compromise, after which Ankara lifted its veto.


Erdogan’s intentions to again block Finland and Sweden from joining NATO weighed

And now it is proposed to remove this protection and return them back. – They gave it to them. Moreover, the Finns can send the Kurds to neighboring Norway to remove this issue. “We were given guarantees.” However, earlier it was about 33 Kurds who are accused in Turkey of terrorist activities. According to him, if the Swedes and Finns refuse to comply with the agreements, the Turkish Parliament will not consider approving their application to join the North Atlantic Alliance. Alternatively, Kurds who have been hiding in the country for a long time can be granted citizenship. Another thing is that Erdogan can slow down this process if Helsinki and Stockholm refuse to fulfill their obligations. The politician referred to the Memorandum of Understanding between the three countries adopted at the beginning of the week. “The Turkish leader has elections next year,” said Nikolai Topornin. “The Turkish leader has the potential to scare the Swedes and Finns by suspending this process”
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan once again said that his country will not ratify the admission of Finland and Sweden to the North Atlantic Alliance if they do not fulfill the obligations previously agreed upon at the NATO summit. Personally, I don’t see such a course of events yet.”
According to the expert, Erdogan continues to send such signals and threats to countries, since this is a matter of principle for him. The tripartite agreement states that both Finland and Sweden must deprive the status of political refugees of more than 70 Turkish citizens, who are just Kurds and Erdogan enrolled in the list of “terrorists”. In fact, he has already done this, although he retained the right of veto. Their current status is quite satisfactory. Therefore, the head of state does not want to leave these obligations on paper. But how far is he willing to go? In turn, the Finnish Minister of Foreign Affairs Pekka Haavisto notified that Suomi would not agree to change the law. According to Erdogan, the implementation of the 10-point agreement by the two countries will depend on whether he sends their application for NATO membership to the Turkish parliament for ratification. “Apparently, Erdogan is unlikely to again block the possibility of Finland and Sweden joining NATO,” Nikolai Topornin, associate professor at MGIMO and director of the Center for European Information, comments to MK. So, theoretically, the Turkish president can arrange lengthy delays in this direction if he is dissatisfied with the actions of NATO “recruits”. Photo: AP
Erdogan reported that the Swedish authorities promised to extradite to Turkey 73 members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), recognized by the Turkish authorities as a terrorist organization. The politician pointed out that the Memorandum does not talk about changes in the law or anything like that. – At the same time, despite the fact that Stockholm and Helsinki are currently going to join the North Atlantic Alliance, they still say that with strong obstacles they can abandon this idea. They will push the Turkish leader to give the green light. There are political opponents inside his country, there is a serious Kurdish national minority that is fighting for the so-called state of Northern Kurdistan, seeking to secede from Turkey. The very human rights mechanisms of Sweden and Finland are such that no one will send political migrants or refugees anywhere. I doubt that Helsinki and Stockholm will send them to Turkey. Maybe he will put up with it, or maybe he will show his character. The expert said whether the Turkish leader will again block the possibility of Finns and Swedes joining the bloc. Moreover, Erdogan said that Finland and Sweden need to amend their legislation on terrorism. After all, even if the applications of Finland and Sweden are accepted, various legal procedures and voting will begin, Turkey will still have the opportunity to stall the process of their admission to NATO.”
Meanwhile, the expert stressed that the Americans, Germans and French could put pressure on Erdogan in this matter. There is a serious problem here, over which the lawyers and politicians of the two European states will have to rack their brains. They have connections, contacts and money to support Erdogan's opponents inside the country, to guide them. Actually, Erdogan himself stated this following the results of the Madrid summit. “We did not take on such obligations,” Haavisto insists. “There is internal opposition there. There are also external oppositionists, such as the famous Fethullah Gulen, who is in the United States. As I understand it, some euphoria has passed among the countries. Perhaps Finland and Sweden will decide to give their citizenship to the Kurds. They obviously face a serious trial in their home country if they are deported.”
This is where certain difficulties arise, the expert believes. “Erdogan has the potential to frighten the Swedes and Finns by suspending this process,” sums up Nikolai Topornin. “Sweden has given its word on the extradition of terrorists, there are about 73 of them,” the head of state said during a press conference following the NATO summit in Madrid. The Turkish authorities stated that if the Finns and Swedes fulfill their obligations, they will not prevent them from joining the North Atlantic Alliance. It seems that this decision suited everyone, including the leadership of the bloc and the United States. We turned to an expert with this question. He needs concrete action. Then Erdogan will be told that they are no longer Turks, but Finns, so no one is going to expel them. Different points of view can be expressed, but there can be no agreement on anything other than what is stated in the text of the document.”
In addition, the Finnish Foreign Minister noted that the country could give in to Turkey’s demands for the extradition of persons , whom she considers terrorists only “if there are very good reasons.”
How, then, can Turkey build obstacles for the Swedes and Finns, if they show obstinacy and do not comply with Ankara's demands? These are not just empty words about respect for the laws of Turkey and the lack of support for some Kurdish separatists. Everything that was agreed upon was written down on paper. What will the Finnish and Swedish authorities look like if they take such a step? – Based on what is now being heard from Brussels, Ankara, Helsinki and Stockholm, the parties have come to compromise solutions. This agreement provides for the cooperation of states against the PKK, showing solidarity with Ankara in the fight against all forms of terrorism, cooperation in the field of information exchange in the fight against organized crime and terrorism, as well as the refusal to support the movements accused of attempting a coup in 2016. Earlier, the Finnish Minister of the Interior even made a lengthy statement that Helsinki would never extradite its citizens to anyone under any circumstances. It is difficult to say how Erdogan will behave further, since he is an unpredictable person. “It is clear for what purpose the Kurds came to these countries – to ask for protection from Erdogan,” continues Nikolai Topornin. If the situation in Ukraine had normalized, I think they would definitely postpone joining NATO.”
Источник Under the procedure, countries seeking to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization must obtain approval of their membership applications from all member states of the bloc and go through the process of ratification by their respective national parliaments. The Turkish leader also added that Ankara will monitor whether Stockholm will fulfill its promise. “If the condition for Turkey's ratification of Finland's membership in NATO is a change in our legislation, Finland is unlikely to make such concessions,” the head of the Finnish foreign policy broadcaster Yle assured. In the meantime, Helsinki emphasized that they would not agree to change the legislation, and that they could extradite the persons requested by Ankara only if there were good reasons.


Erdogan listed the promises of Sweden and Finland for NATO membership

From now on, we will carefully monitor the process and take reciprocal steps,— quotes Turkish President CNN Turk. «Main— fulfill your promises. Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone

Источник At the NATO summit, which began in Madrid on June 28, Turkey, Sweden and Finland held talks, as a result of which Ankara agreed to join. After that, NATO officially invited Sweden and Finland to the alliance, and the Secretary General of the organization, Jens Stoltenberg, announced that the entry would be one of the fastest in the history of the military bloc. Sweden and Finland have announced plans to join NATO after the start of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, but Turkey's position has become an obstacle, which said that the two countries provide asylum to members of the PKK and supporters of the religious figure Fethullah Gülen, whom the Turkish authorities consider the mastermind of the 2016 coup attempt.. In particular, the President of the Republic said that Sweden promised to expel 73 members of the PKK, which has been declared a terrorist organization in Turkey

Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Sweden and Finland must fulfill the promises made to Ankara, after which the Turkish parliament will ratify their applications for NATO membership (the candidate must receive approval from all member countries of the organization), Recep Tayyip Erdogan said at a press conference following the summit of the North Atlantic Alliance. The politician said that Sweden and Finland should extradite “terrorists” to Ankara, amend the legislation on terrorist organizations as soon as possible, and also “prevent terrorist propaganda against Turkey.”
“Sweden promises that 73 terrorists will be extradited to Turkey»,— he said, noting that he received the appropriate guarantees. Read on RBC Pro Pro How companies won court cases with employees thanks to KEDO: three cases for employees Instructions Pro Maximum 730 thousand rubles: how much testers and DevOps engineers are paid Articles Pro Skeletons in the closet: how to protect yourself from “surprises” when buying a business Eat what nature intended to lose weight and improve health Summary Pro Five mistakes in PR that will lead businesses to losses in 2022 Articles
Russian President Vladimir Putin, commenting on the plans of Finland and Sweden to join NATO, said that in Russia is “not concerned about this”, but warned of a mirror response from Moscow in the event that the military contingent and alliance infrastructure are deployed in these countries.


NATO has identified Russia as a “major security threat”

Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone

Источник And how to adjust them Instructions Pro Skeletons in the closet: how to protect yourself from “surprises” when buying a business Cases Pro How to conduct and arrange a set-off of mutual requirements Instructions Pro How to become your new leader: four rules and ten taboos Instructions Pro Participatory capitalism. The Strategic Concept outlines NATO's security goals and objectives, as well as the challenges the Alliance faces in a changing security environment. NATO countries agreed that they would continue to counter the “Russian threats”, its “irresponsible rhetoric” and respond to “her hostile actions.”
The North Atlantic Alliance called on Russia to immediately stop the military special operation in Ukraine, and Belarus— “cease your complicity” in it. Read on RBC Pro Pro Fast food and brain exercise: Warren Buffett keeps fit Pro Articles Seven Negative Attitudes of a Sales Manager. “The Russian Federation is the most serious and direct threat to the security of NATO members and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region,” stressed in the statement. A new NATO strategic concept document is adopted for the next ten years. In addition, NATO said that China challenges the interests, security and values ​​of the West, and seeks to undermine the international order. NATO Summit takes place from 28 to 30 June in Madrid. NATO members demanded that Russia “immediately stop” the military special operation in Ukraine, and Belarus – “stop its complicity” in it. The alliance also accused China of seeking to “undermine the international order”

The new NATO Strategic Concept calls Russia “the main security threat.” This is stated in a statement following the meeting of the participating countries, published on the website of the alliance. A global economy that works for progress, people and the planet Summary Pro How to find hope in the most difficult situation: 6 rules Instructions Pro How to write the perfect cover letter: 12 steps Articles
In the strategic concept “Active participation, modern defense» (2010) outlines three main objectives: collective defense, crisis management and cooperative security.


Sweden and Finland received an invitation to join NATO

Sweden and Finland announced their intention to join NATO after the start of Russia's special operation in Ukraine. Now the accession of Sweden and Finland will have to be approved by the parliaments of 30 countries— members of the military-political bloc. The parties were negotiating and on June 28, the Office of the Finnish President reported that the differences had been settled and Ankara would support the applications of the two countries. Now the accession of Sweden and Finland will have to be approved by the parliaments of 30 NATO member countries ” alt=”Sweden and Finland received an invitation to join NATO” />
NATO has officially invited Sweden and Finland to join the alliance, according to its website. According to the NATO official, the membership of Finland and Sweden “will change the whole situation in the Baltic region” because they will “cover up” Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia and will allow to strengthen the presence of the bloc. And how to correct them Instructions Pro How to “get around” sanctions: alternative ways to deliver goods from Europe in the shape of Warren Buffett Articles
As NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said, the upcoming entry of Finland and Sweden will send a signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that the doors of the alliance remain open and now he will “get more NATO at the Russian borders”, although he sought the opposite. Putinge warned that the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO could aggravate the already “difficult situation in the field of international security.” According to him, although the expansion of the bloc at the expense of these countries will not create an “immediate threat” for Russia, it will be forced to respond if additional military infrastructure appears on their territories. “The accession of Finland and Sweden will make them more secure, NATO— stronger, and the Euro-Atlantic region— safer. Both countries emphasized that the decision was not directed against Moscow and was due to the changed security situation. Video
Read on RBC Pro Pro How to conduct and file a offset of mutual claims Instructions Pro Sunstroke: how to avoid it and what to do in case of overheating Instructions Pro A very bad forecast: how a shortage of imported weather instruments hits business Forecasts Pro Seven negative attitudes of a sales manager. According to Deputy Head of Department Sergei Ryabkov, the admission of new countries to the bloc does not add security to either the entrants, or the alliance, or other states that “perceive it as a threat.”

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even during lockdowns

Источник The Foreign Ministry also reacted negatively to the future entry of the two countries into the bloc, which considers the expansion of the alliance “a purely destabilizing factor in international affairs” ;. These countries now have invited status. However, Turkey opposed the membership of Sweden and Finland, which demanded that they extradite members of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), whom it considers by terrorists, closing down all organizations associated with the PKK and providing guarantees. The security of Finland and Sweden is of paramount importance to the North Atlantic Alliance, including during the accession process,— the NATO statement says.